He asserts (argument is absent) that, because things in Iraq are so rosy, Bush should be acclaimed as a success.
Apparently,Mr. Medved is ignorant of metaphysics and the Constitution.
Altho his analysis is profoundly flawed (Says Sam Huntington), if Medved were correct he would still be the victim of consequentialism – that is, asserting that doing something wrong wrought something right.
Only God can bring good out of evil. Bush didn’t, and Medved can’t.